Juliet Landau Instagram – PART 4 (please see part 1, 2 & 3 first)
“Because of the particularly sensitive nature of the Confidential Viewership Information, the Union agrees to grant access to the Confidential Viewership Information only to a limited number of individuals whose access to the Confidential Viewership Information is essential for the Union’s use of this information, but not to exceed six (6) in number.” – Again, why no transparency? Why is it confidential? Why the need for this info to be given to only 6 people in the union. Who will those 6 people be?
“The Union may request that an audit (or other agreed-upon procedure) (hereafter ‘audit’) of the Confidential Viewership Information be conducted by a third party jointly chosen by the related/affiliated SVOD service and the Union solely for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the information provided by the related/affiliated SVOD Service. The third party must execute a confidentiality agreement approved by the related/affiliated SVOD Service. The Union shall be responsible for bearing all costs and fees associated with any such audit.” -Why should it only fall on the Union? SAG won’t do this very often because it will cost them.
Justine Bateman summarized the deal well on The Wrap and why to vote NO:
https://www.thewrap.com/justine-bateman-sag-aftra-deal-generative-ai-artificial-intelligence/
Read salient comments on SAG/ AFTRA post below.
Matthew Modine on why to vote NO:
https://tinyurl.com/5aptua8n
Professor Stephen Hawking, Microsoft Co-founder Bill Gates and Apple Co-founder Steve Wozniak all are concerned about AI. Wozniak wants to pause, take steps, prepare, put true regulations in place. He said, “Computers are going to take over from humans, no question.” I vote no, so computers do not take the place of actors in the screen actors (not screen replica of actors) guild.
SAG / AFTRA says to trust them. They know what is best for us but I trust facts.
Lots of love,
Juliet and Dev | Posted on 27/Nov/2023 01:42:25
