Home Actress Jen Gunter HD Instagram Photos and Wallpapers April 2024 Jen Gunter Instagram - I wrote about the new study looking at the use of hormone therapy for those age 65 and older. This is not starting therapy, but continuing. It is an observational study, so has limitations. Here’s a summary for the estrogen only portion. This does not apply to estrogen plus a progestogen, I will cover that part in another post. My full write up is at TheVajenda.com where you will find a lot more detail. **** In most cases the best outcomes were seen with transdermal or vaginal therapy and at lower or medium doses. One exception is oral Premarin and breast cancer. All the estrogens reduced mortality, with estradiol at 21%, which was better than Premarin at 13%. With breast cancer, had the greatest benefit with a 23% reduction. However, transdermal estradiol was associated with a 14% reduction in breast cancer risk. As expected, low-dose vaginal estrogen, which should not be absorbed, was neutral from a breast cancer reduction perspective. Colon and lung cancer reduction was fairly similar across all the estrogens. The reduction in lung cancer with low-dose vaginal estrogen doesn’t seem biologically plausible! Improvement in heart disease was less certain, but a positive trend was seen with lower doses and transdermal/vaginal. Reduction in dementia was only seen with low dose transdermal. Would not draw any grand conclusions about dementia. There were some issues, specifically some unexplainable health benefits were seen with low dose vaginal estrogen, which sometimes performed better than transdermal estrogen which seems biologically implausible. This suggests there may be some biases we don’t know about and I would causation people from jumping to conclusions about using this study to start therapy, otherwise you are going to have to explain how low dose vaginal estradiol tablets and the estradiol ring reduce lung cancer! Overall, there were no concerning safety signals, and that is reassuring. So the idea that women are increasing their risk of breast cancer, heart disease, or dementia by staying on estrogen therapy over age 65 isn’t supported by this study. Stay tuned for my write up on the estrogen and progestogen part of the study.

Jen Gunter Instagram – I wrote about the new study looking at the use of hormone therapy for those age 65 and older. This is not starting therapy, but continuing. It is an observational study, so has limitations. Here’s a summary for the estrogen only portion. This does not apply to estrogen plus a progestogen, I will cover that part in another post. My full write up is at TheVajenda.com where you will find a lot more detail. **** In most cases the best outcomes were seen with transdermal or vaginal therapy and at lower or medium doses. One exception is oral Premarin and breast cancer. All the estrogens reduced mortality, with estradiol at 21%, which was better than Premarin at 13%. With breast cancer, had the greatest benefit with a 23% reduction. However, transdermal estradiol was associated with a 14% reduction in breast cancer risk. As expected, low-dose vaginal estrogen, which should not be absorbed, was neutral from a breast cancer reduction perspective. Colon and lung cancer reduction was fairly similar across all the estrogens. The reduction in lung cancer with low-dose vaginal estrogen doesn’t seem biologically plausible! Improvement in heart disease was less certain, but a positive trend was seen with lower doses and transdermal/vaginal. Reduction in dementia was only seen with low dose transdermal. Would not draw any grand conclusions about dementia. There were some issues, specifically some unexplainable health benefits were seen with low dose vaginal estrogen, which sometimes performed better than transdermal estrogen which seems biologically implausible. This suggests there may be some biases we don’t know about and I would causation people from jumping to conclusions about using this study to start therapy, otherwise you are going to have to explain how low dose vaginal estradiol tablets and the estradiol ring reduce lung cancer! Overall, there were no concerning safety signals, and that is reassuring. So the idea that women are increasing their risk of breast cancer, heart disease, or dementia by staying on estrogen therapy over age 65 isn’t supported by this study. Stay tuned for my write up on the estrogen and progestogen part of the study.

Jen Gunter Instagram - I wrote about the new study looking at the use of hormone therapy for those age 65 and older. This is not starting therapy, but continuing. It is an observational study, so has limitations. Here’s a summary for the estrogen only portion. This does not apply to estrogen plus a progestogen, I will cover that part in another post. My full write up is at TheVajenda.com where you will find a lot more detail. **** In most cases the best outcomes were seen with transdermal or vaginal therapy and at lower or medium doses. One exception is oral Premarin and breast cancer. All the estrogens reduced mortality, with estradiol at 21%, which was better than Premarin at 13%. With breast cancer, had the greatest benefit with a 23% reduction. However, transdermal estradiol was associated with a 14% reduction in breast cancer risk. As expected, low-dose vaginal estrogen, which should not be absorbed, was neutral from a breast cancer reduction perspective. Colon and lung cancer reduction was fairly similar across all the estrogens. The reduction in lung cancer with low-dose vaginal estrogen doesn’t seem biologically plausible! Improvement in heart disease was less certain, but a positive trend was seen with lower doses and transdermal/vaginal. Reduction in dementia was only seen with low dose transdermal. Would not draw any grand conclusions about dementia. There were some issues, specifically some unexplainable health benefits were seen with low dose vaginal estrogen, which sometimes performed better than transdermal estrogen which seems biologically implausible. This suggests there may be some biases we don’t know about and I would causation people from jumping to conclusions about using this study to start therapy, otherwise you are going to have to explain how low dose vaginal estradiol tablets and the estradiol ring reduce lung cancer! Overall, there were no concerning safety signals, and that is reassuring. So the idea that women are increasing their risk of breast cancer, heart disease, or dementia by staying on estrogen therapy over age 65 isn’t supported by this study. Stay tuned for my write up on the estrogen and progestogen part of the study.

Jen Gunter Instagram – I wrote about the new study looking at the use of hormone therapy for those age 65 and older. This is not starting therapy, but continuing. It is an observational study, so has limitations. Here’s a summary for the estrogen only portion. This does not apply to estrogen plus a progestogen, I will cover that part in another post. My full write up is at TheVajenda.com where you will find a lot more detail.

****

In most cases the best outcomes were seen with transdermal or vaginal therapy and at lower or medium doses. One exception is oral Premarin and breast cancer.

All the estrogens reduced mortality, with estradiol at 21%, which was better than Premarin at 13%.

With breast cancer, had the greatest benefit with a 23% reduction. However, transdermal estradiol was associated with a 14% reduction in breast cancer risk. As expected, low-dose vaginal estrogen, which should not be absorbed, was neutral from a breast cancer reduction perspective. Colon and lung cancer reduction was fairly similar across all the estrogens. The reduction in lung cancer with low-dose vaginal estrogen doesn’t seem biologically plausible!

Improvement in heart disease was less certain, but a positive trend was seen with lower doses and transdermal/vaginal.

Reduction in dementia was only seen with low dose transdermal. Would not draw any grand conclusions about dementia.

There were some issues, specifically some unexplainable health benefits were seen with low dose vaginal estrogen, which sometimes performed better than transdermal estrogen which seems biologically implausible. This suggests there may be some biases we don’t know about and I would causation people from jumping to conclusions about using this study to start therapy, otherwise you are going to have to explain how low dose vaginal estradiol tablets and the estradiol ring reduce lung cancer!

Overall, there were no concerning safety signals, and that is reassuring. So the idea that women are increasing their risk of breast cancer, heart disease, or dementia by staying on estrogen therapy over age 65 isn’t supported by this study. Stay tuned for my write up on the estrogen and progestogen part of the study. | Posted on 26/Apr/2024 09:15:21

Jen Gunter Instagram – Love this pharmacy vending machine at USC! No GYNO crap to be found! 

Instead, birth control pills, plan B, condoms, tampons, COVID tests, and hydrocortisone (the thing to use in a pinch for a bad vulvar itch instead of Vagisil, the devil’s own sav. (Vagisil has benzocaine and this can cause allergic reactions and irritation. And we hate Vagisil because of they are a massive part of the feminine hygiene industry invested in the messaging that women smell).
Jen Gunter Instagram – Lots of questions about testosterone lately and I am not sure why, but because of these I wrote a very detailed post for The Vajenda last week. 

I have included several slides summarizing the Global Consensus Statement on the Use of Testosterone for Women and a summary of the British Menopause Society recommendations. If the data is there to support testosterone for many reasons outside of low libido, why can’t any menopause of endocrine society find it? I also included a slide with the organizations that signed off on the statement. 

Here is the summary from my piece. Head to The Vajenda if you want the whole piece or the references:

✅ Testosterone levels gradually decrease throughout a woman’s lifetime. There is no sharp drop around menopause. 

🤝The majority of testosterone is bound to carrier proteins, but we still don’t really understand what that means regarding testosterone’s impact on the body.

🏭Testosterone has a significant intracrinology, meaning it is also made inside cells, so testosterone levels really do not tell us the whole picture. 

✅Checking testosterone for well-being or symptoms of menopause is unhelpful and a waste of your hard-earned money. 

❓Testosterone levels don’t predict symptoms.

📊Current studies do not support the use of testosterone for ANY reason outside of treating libido. This includes muscle mass and protecting bone health.

📑Studies with primary ovarian insufficiency don’t show an added benefit from testosterone.

💪Improvement in muscle mass/strength likely only occurs when testosterone levels are much higher than normal.

Check out the latest gallery of Jen Gunter