🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
🇷🇸 – Arbitraža JESTE realan problem i pretnja. Ali je bitno informisati javnost o pravnim okvirima istog. Povodom teksta o navodnoj „pripremi arbitraže“ Rio Tinta protiv Srbije: ova informacija nije nova niti iznenađujuća. Mogućnost arbitraže je javno poznata još od 2024. godine, a o njoj je izveštavao i Investment Arbitration Reporter. Interni dokumenti objavljeni nakon „pauze“ projekta Jadar dodatno potvrđuju da je kompanija od tada razmatrala sve scenarije — uključujući arbitražu. Problem nije u činjenicama, već u načinu na koji se one politički koriste. Umesto da se javnosti objasne zakon, institucionalne nadležnosti i stvarni rizici, arbitraža se ponovo koristi kao sredstvo zastrašivanja. Kao i prethodnih godina, obrazovanje javnosti ne dolazi od političara — već od građana i civilnog društva. Zakon je jasan. Rizici su bili poznati. Arbitraža ne suspenduje srpsko pravo. 🇬🇧 – Arbitration is a real threat, but it’s important not to wave it around as political scare mongering, but rather educate the public on the realities of it’s legal paramaters. In response to the article claiming Rio Tinto is “preparing” arbitration against Serbia: this is not new information. The possibility of arbitration has been publicly known since at least 2024, including reporting by Investment Arbitration Reporter. Internal documents released after the “pause” of the Jadar project further confirm that arbitration has long been considered. The issue is not the facts, but how they are politically framed. Instead of explaining the legal framework, institutional competences, and real risks, arbitration is once again used as a scare tactic. As in previous years, public education does not come from politicians — it comes from citizens and civil society. The law is clear. The risks were known. Arbitration does not override domestic law. #marssadrine Izvor: @n1srbija_
